Skip to main content
CivixlyCivixly
HomeFederal GovernmentState GovernmentLearnCommunityFeedback
Sign InCreate Account
Menu
HomeFederal GovernmentState GovernmentLearnCommunityFeedback
Sign InCreate Account
Civixly

Find representatives, follow federal and state legislation, and connect public records to the people and institutions responsible for them.

Explore

Federal governmentState governmentCivics guides

About the data

About CivixlyMethodologyData sources

Help improve Civixly

Send feedback or a correctionCommunity

State Government / California / Legislation / AB 2555

AB 2555Session 20252026HouseSent to governor

English learners: reclassification.

Existing law requires each school district that has one or more pupils who are English learners, and, to the extent required by federal law, each county office of education and each charter school, to assess the English language development of each pupil in order to determine the pupil's level of proficiency, as specified. Existing law requires the assessment for initial identification to be conducted upon the initial enrollment of a pupil, as provided. Existing law requires the State Department of Education, with the approval of the State Board of Education, to establish procedures for conducting the assessment and for the reclassification of a pupil from English learner to English proficient. Existing law requires those reclassification procedures to use multiple criteria in determining whether to reclassify a pupil as proficient in English, including, (1) an assessment of language proficiency using an objective assessment instrument, including the English language development test that is developed or acquired by the Superintendent of Public Instruction, (2) teacher evaluation, (3) parental opinion and consultation, and (4) a comparison of the performance of the pupil in basic skills against an empirically established range of performance in basic skills based upon the performance of English proficient pupils of the same age that demonstrates whether the pupil is sufficiently proficient in English to participate effectively in a curriculum designed for pupils of the same age whose native language is English. Existing law provides that parents and guardians of children enrolled in public schools have the right and should have the opportunity, as mutually supportive and respectful partners in the education of their children within the public schools, to be informed by the school, and to participate in the education of their children, as specified, including by, among other things, meeting with their child's teacher or teachers and the principal of the school in which their child is enrolled within a reasonable time of their request. This bill would make the provisions related to reclassification procedures inoperative on July 1, 2027, and would repeal them as of January 1, 2028. Commencing July 1, 2027, this bill would require a school district, county office of education, or charter school to communicate to the parent or guardian of a pupil who is determined to be an English learner in a clear, concise, and comprehensible manner specified information regarding the pupil, including, among other things, that the pupil has been classified as an English learner, that the parent or guardian is encouraged to engage as a partner with the school, as provided, and that the pupil will take an assessment each year to measure the pupil's progress toward becoming proficient in English. The bill would instead require that an English learner pupil who, in the 2025–26 school year or any school year thereafter, meets the score established by the state board for purposes of reclassification on an assessment of English language proficiency identified or developed pursuant to specified provisions, or, if applicable, the pupil meets the score established by the state board for purposes of reclassification on the statewide alternate assessment for English language proficiency, as provided, be reclassified as English proficient, as specified. Commencing July 1, 2027, the bill would require the department, as those pupil scores become available, to record the pupils who meet the scores established by the state board as reclassified in the appropriate data system. After a pupil is reclassified, the bill would require a local educational agency to ensure that the pupil's instructional program and placement reflects that the pupil is a reclassified pupil and communicate to the pupil's parent or guardian that their child has been reclassified, as provided. Commencing July 1, 2028, and subject to the availability of rubrics and sample alternate pupil work and performance tasks described below, the bill would require a pupil who (1) is an English learner, (2) has an individualized education program (IEP) , (3) received English language development instruction but has not achieved the proficiency level required for purposes of reclassification, (4) has used all designated supports and accommodations and any domain exemptions required by the pupil's IEP, and (5) either scored an overall performance level that is one level below the level established by the state board for purposes of reclassification, or, as applicable, received any score on the statewide alternate assessment for English language proficiency, and whose local educational agency determines that the pupil has demonstrated, through the use of specified alternate coursework and performance tasks, that the pupil has reached a level of proficiency that is comparable to the threshold for reclassification on the assessment of English language proficiency or the statewide alternate assessment for English language proficiency, to be reported to the department by the local educational agency as reclassified as English proficient. The bill would require a local educational agency, for a pupil who has been reclassified as English proficient, to monitor the pupil's progress to ensure, among other things, that English proficiency is not a barrier to the pupil's academic success, as provided. By imposing additional duties on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would provide that, commencing January 1, 2027, parents or guardians of children enrolled in public schools also have the right to, among other things, meet with their child's teacher or teachers to discuss their child's progress toward reaching proficiency in English, as provided. By imposing new duties on public schools, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require the state board, on or before January 1, 2028, to identify (1) means of monitoring reclassified pupils for 4 years after reclassification and (2) an appropriate instrument to be used for purposes of monitoring the progress of reclassified English learners, as provided. The bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2028, to identify appropriate interventions for pupils who have been determined as needing additional support for their English language, as provided. Commencing with the 2027–28 school year, and subject to state and federal law regarding the privacy of pupil information, the bill would require the department to annually post on its internet website the reclassification rates of each local educational agency and charter school, statewide reclassification rates, and outcomes of reclassified pupils, as provided. Existing law requires the Sacramento County Office of Education to utilize specified funding appropriated in the Budget Act of 2026 to develop resources and provide technical assistance to support the implementation of alternative pathways and means to a diploma, as provided. This bill would require the Sacramento County Office of Education to utilize the same funding described above to (1) develop rubrics and sample alternate pupil work and performance tasks to enable pupils who are English learners and have IEPs to demonstrate proficiency for purposes of reclassification, and (2) submit the completed rubrics and sample alternate pupil work and performance tasks to the department on or before January 1, 2028. By expanding the purposes for which previously appropriated funds may be used, this bill would make an appropriation. The bill would require the department to (1) post the completed rubrics and sample alternate pupil work and performance tasks submitted by the Sacramento County Office of Education on its internet website on or before June 30, 2028, and (2) , subject to an appropriation for these purposes, contract for an evaluation of the effects of the changes to the reclassification criteria and process required by the bill to be completed and sent to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature on or before January 1, 2032, as provided. This bill would delete obsolete provisions. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 51101 of the Education Code proposed by SB 1412 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1412 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Latest development · Sep 4, 2026

Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

Your view
Source record ↗
Session
20252026
Introduced
Feb 20, 2026
Latest passage
Aug 27, 2026
TopicsSponsorsActionsDiscussion

Topics and classification

Civixly topics

Budget & TaxesEducationElections & GovernmentCivil RightsTechnology & Communications

Source subjects

Englishlearnersreclassification

Document type

BillAppropriation

Sponsors

Primary sponsors are listed before cosponsors and other sponsoring entities.

Primary sponsorPatel
coauthorBonta
coauthorHoover
coauthorLowenthal
coauthorMacedo
coauthorMuratsuchi
coauthorPellerin
coauthorRivas
coauthorZbur

Action timeline

Newest action first. Action language is supplied by the state source.

View full action timeline29 actions⌄
  1. Sep 4, 2026

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

    Executive ReceiptCalifornia State Legislature
  2. Aug 27, 2026

    Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0.).

    Amendment PassageCommittee PassageCommittee Passage FavorablePassageAssembly
  3. Aug 27, 2026

    In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

    Assembly
  4. Aug 26, 2026

    Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.).

    Amendment PassagePassageReading 1Reading 3Senate
  5. Aug 24, 2026

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    Reading 1Reading 2Reading 3Senate
  6. Aug 20, 2026

    Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

    Amendment PassageReading 1Reading 2Reading 3Senate
  7. Aug 17, 2026

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    Reading 1Reading 2Reading 3Senate
  8. Aug 13, 2026

    Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

    Amendment PassageReading 1Reading 2Senate
  9. Aug 13, 2026

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 13).

    Amendment IntroductionAmendment PassageCommittee PassageSenate
  10. Aug 3, 2026

    In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    Referral CommitteeSenate
  11. Jun 25, 2026

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    Committee PassageCommittee Passage FavorableReferral CommitteeSenate
  12. Jun 10, 2026

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.

    Amendment IntroductionAmendment PassageCommittee PassageReading 1Reading 2Referral CommitteeSenate
  13. Jun 10, 2026

    Referred to Com. on ED.

    Referral CommitteeSenate
  14. May 27, 2026

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    Reading 1Referral CommitteeSenate
  15. May 26, 2026

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0.)

    PassageReading 1Reading 3Assembly
  16. May 18, 2026

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    Reading 1Reading 2Reading 3Assembly
  17. May 14, 2026

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 14).

    Committee PassageCommittee Passage FavorableAssembly
  18. May 14, 2026

    Coauthors revised.

    Assembly
  19. May 14, 2026

    Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 5030.)

    Assembly
  20. May 13, 2026

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    Referral CommitteeAssembly
  21. May 6, 2026

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

    Assembly
  22. Apr 16, 2026

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    Referral CommitteeAssembly
  23. Apr 15, 2026

    Read second time and amended.

    Amendment PassageReading 1Reading 2Assembly
  24. Apr 14, 2026

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 8).

    Amendment IntroductionAmendment PassageCommittee PassageReferral CommitteeAssembly
  25. Mar 17, 2026

    Re-referred to Com. on ED.

    Referral CommitteeAssembly
  26. Mar 16, 2026

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

    Amendment IntroductionAmendment PassageCommittee PassageReading 1Reading 2Referral CommitteeAssembly
  27. Mar 9, 2026

    Referred to Com. on ED.

    Referral CommitteeAssembly
  28. Feb 21, 2026

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

    Assembly
  29. Feb 20, 2026

    Read first time. To print.

    Reading 1Assembly

AB 2555 discussion

0 comments

Sign in to join the discussion.Comments are publicly visible.

Loading comments...

State legislative data provided by Open States and linked legislature sources when available.

Civixly tracks state bill actions, passage dates, and sponsors. Member-level state roll-call histories are not included.

Source data last updated Sep 5, 2026.