CivixlyCivixly
HomeFederal GovernmentState GovernmentLearnCommunityFeedback
Sign InCreate Account

State Government / California / Legislation / SB 1004

SB 1004Session 20252026SenateStatus unavailable

Law enforcement: masks.

Existing law makes it a crime for a law enforcement officer to wear a facial covering in the performance of their duties, except as specified. Existing law defines law enforcement officer for these purposes as anyone designated by California law as a peace officer who is employed by a city, county, or other local agency, and any officer or agent of a federal law enforcement agency, agency or law enforcement agency of another state, or any person acting on behalf of a federal law enforcement agency. This bill would add peace officers employed by a state agency to the definition of law enforcement officers, thereby making those law enforcement officers subject to those criminal penalties. The bill would specify that facial coverings does not include certain items, including, among other things, sunglasses. The bill would, for all of the items excluded from the definition of facial coverings, limit that exclusion if the items are combined or otherwise used in a manner intended to conceal or obscure an officer's identity. By expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law prohibits any person who is found to have committed an assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, abuse of process, or malicious prosecution, while wearing a facial covering in a knowing and willful violation of these provisions, from asserting any privilege or immunity for their tortious conduct against a claim of civil liability, and makes that person liable for the greater of actual damages or statutory damages of not less than $10,000, whichever is greater. This bill would instead make a person who is found liable for false imprisonment or false arrest liable for those damages if the trier of fact finds that the person knowingly and willfully concealed their identity through the use of a facial covering at the time of the conduct giving rise to liability. Existing law requires a law enforcement agency operating in California to, by July 1, 2026, maintain and publicly post a written policy limiting the use of facial coverings, as specified. Existing law defines a law enforcement agency for these purposes as any entity of a city, county, or other local agency, that employs anyone designated by California law as a peace officer, any federal law enforcement agency, or any law enforcement agency of another state. This bill would add to the definition of law enforcement agency, a state entity that employs a peace officer and would change the date any law enforcement agency has to comply with that requirement to January 1, 2027. The bill would also require those policies to exempt certain surveillance operations related to enforcement of the Fish and Game Code, or similar federal law. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Your view
Official source ↗

Current stage

Status unavailable

Introduced

Feb 9, 2026

Latest action

Sep 2, 2026

Recorded roll calls

8

Topics and classification

Civixly topics

EducationJustice & Public Safety

Source subjects

Lawenforcementmasks

Document type

Bill

Sponsors

Primary sponsors are listed before cosponsors and other sponsoring entities.

Primary sponsorWiener
authorArreguín
principal coauthor

Bryan

principal coauthor

Carrillo

coauthor

Connolly

coauthor

Elhawary

principal coauthor

Garcia

coauthor

Gonzalez

coauthor

Kalra

coauthor

Lee

coauthor

Mark González

coauthorMcNerney
coauthorMenjivar
coauthor

Ortega

authorPérez
coauthor

Quirk-Silva

principal coauthor

Schultz

coauthor

Sharp-Collins

coauthorSmallwood-Cuevas
coauthor

Solache

authorWahab
coauthorWeber Pierson

Action timeline

Newest action first. Action language is supplied by the state source.

The detailed timeline has not been imported yet.

Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

Roll-call votes

The newest recorded chamber votes appear first. Your own representatives are highlighted when available.

passAug 27, 2026Senate

Unfinished Business SB1004 Wiener et al. Concurrence

Vote source ↗
29 yes11 no0 other
View 40 recorded positions
Allenyes
Alvarado-Gilno
Archuletayes
Arreguínyes
Ashbyyes
Beckeryes
Blakespearyes
Cabaldonyes
Caballeroyes
Cervantesyes
Choino
Corteseyes
Dahleno
Durazoyes
Gonzalezyes
Graysonyes
Groveno
Hurtadono
Jonesno
Lairdyes
Limónyes
McGuireyes
McNerneyyes
Menjivaryes
Niellono
Ochoa Boghno
Padillayes
Pérezyes
Reyesyes
Richardsonyes
Rubioyes
Seyartono
Smallwood-Cuevasyes
Sternyes
Stricklandno
Umbergyes
Valladaresno
Wahabyes
Weber Piersonyes
Wieneryes
passAug 26, 2026Assembly

SB 1004 Wiener Senate Third Reading By Schultz

Vote source ↗
44 yes22 no13 other
View 79 recorded positions
Addisyes
Aguiar-Curryyes
Ahrensyes
Alanisno
Alvarezyes
Arambulayes
Ávila Faríasother
Bainsother
Bauer-Kahanyes
Bennettyes
Bermanyes
Blanca Rubioother
Boerneryes
Bontayes
Bryanyes
Calderonother
Calozayes
Carrilloyes
Castillono
Celeste Rodriguezyes
Chenno
Connollyyes
Daviesno
DeMaiono
Dixonno
Elhawaryyes
Ellisno
Florano
Fongyes
Gabrielyes
Garciayes
Gipsonyes
Hadwickno
Haneyyes
Harabedianyes
Hartyes
Hooverno
Irwinyes
Jacksonyes
Jeff Gonzalezno
Johnsonno
Kalrayes
Krellother
Lackeyno
Leeyes
Lowenthalyes
Macedono
Mark Gonzálezyes
McKinnoryes
Michelle Rodriguezno
Muratsuchiyes
Nguyenother
Ortegayes
Pachecono
Papanyes
Patelother
Pattersonno
Pellerinyes
Petrie-Norrisother
Quirk-Silvayes
Ramosno
Ransomother
Rivasyes
Rogersyes
Sanchezno
Schiavoother
Schultzyes
Sharp-Collinsyes
Solacheyes
Soriaother
Stefaniyes
Tano
Tangipano
Valenciaother
Wallisno
Wardyes
Wicksyes
Wilsonother
Zburyes
passAug 13, 2026Assembly

Do pass as amended.

Vote source ↗
11 yes4 no0 other
View 15 recorded positions
Arambulayes
Calderonyes
Calozayes
Dixonno
Fongyes
Hooverno
Krellyes
Mark Gonzálezyes
Pachecoyes
Pellerinyes
Sharp-Collinsyes
Solacheyes
Tano
Tangipano
Wicksyes
passJun 23, 2026Assembly

Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

Vote source ↗
5 yes3 no1 other
View 9 recorded positions
Alanisno
Haneyyes
Harabedianyes
Lackeyno
Mark Gonzálezyes
Nguyenother
Ramosno
Schultzyes
Sharp-Collinsyes
passMay 19, 2026Senate

3rd Reading SB1004 Wiener et al.

Vote source ↗
28 yes9 no3 other
View 40 recorded positions
Allenother
Alvarado-Gilno
Archuletayes
Arreguínyes
Ashbyyes
Beckeryes
Blakespearyes
Cabaldonyes
Caballeroyes
Cervantesyes
Choino
Corteseyes
Dahleno
Durazoyes
Gonzalezyes
Graysonyes
Groveno
Hurtadoother
Jonesno
Lairdyes
Limónyes
McGuireyes
McNerneyyes
Menjivaryes
Nielloother
Ochoa Boghno
Padillayes
Pérezyes
Reyesyes
Richardsonyes
Rubioyes
Seyartono
Smallwood-Cuevasyes
Sternyes
Stricklandno
Umbergyes
Valladaresno
Wahabyes
Weber Piersonyes
Wieneryes
passMay 14, 2026Senate

Do pass as amended

Vote source ↗
5 yes2 no0 other
View 7 recorded positions
Cabaldonyes
Cervantesyes
Dahleno
Graysonyes
Richardsonyes
Seyartono
Wahabyes
passApr 27, 2026Senate

Placed on suspense file

Vote source ↗
7 yes0 no0 other
View 7 recorded positions
Cabaldonyes
Cervantesyes
Dahleyes
Graysonyes
Richardsonyes
Seyartoyes
Wahabyes
passApr 14, 2026Senate

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

Vote source ↗
5 yes1 no0 other
View 6 recorded positions
Arreguínyes
Caballeroyes
Corteseyes
Pérezyes
Seyartono
Wieneryes

SB 1004 discussion

0 comments

Sign in to join the discussion.Comments are publicly visible.

Loading comments...

State legislative data provided by Open States and available official sources.

Source data last updated Sep 3, 2026.