CivixlyCivixly
HomeFederal GovernmentState GovernmentLearnCommunityFeedback
Sign InCreate Account

State Government / California / Legislation / SB 1105

SB 1105Session 20252026SenateStatus unavailable

Law enforcement.

Existing law defines those persons who are peace officers in the state, grants certain authority to those individuals and their employing entities, and places certain requirements on those individuals and their employing entities. Under existing law, federal criminal investigators and law enforcement officers are not California peace officers but are granted specified limited arrest authority in limited circumstances including when violations of state and local laws occur in their presence, when there is an immediate danger to persons or property, when detaining a person for evaluation or treatment who, due to a mental illness, is a danger to themselves or others, and when requested by a California law enforcement agency to be involved in a joint task force or criminal investigation. Existing law additionally grants peace officer status to federal employees who comply with certain training requirements, while they are engaged in enforcing state or local law on and adjacent to property owned or possessed by the United States Government, with the written consent of local law enforcement officials, as specified. This bill would remove certain arrest authority or peace officer status for federal criminal investigators, law enforcement officers, and federal employees, including for the purposes of executing a warrant for the arrest of a person. The bill would authorize deputized tribal law enforcement officers of the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs to exercise the powers of arrest, as specified, if, among other things, they are engaged in the enforcement of federal criminal law and they are exercising arrest powers that are incidental to the performance of those federal duties. The bill would also authorize certain federal employees of, among other agencies, the National Park Service and the Bureau of Land Management, if they are enforcing specified provisions of state law on property owned by the United States government, to exercise peace officer status with the written consent of the sheriff or the chief of police from the respective jurisdiction. The bill would also prohibit a California law enforcement agency, as defined, from entering into an interagency agreement, unless, among other things, the agreement is in writing and expressly provides that the agency shall not engage in racial or identity profiling, as specified. The bill would deem any interagency agreement in existence on January 1, 2027, valid, and would authorize that agreement to remain in effect until July 1, 2027. The bill would require, by no later than July 1, 2027, that the agreement be amended to include the provisions described above, including a prohibition on engaging in certain conduct, including racial or identity profiling. By increasing the duties on local law enforcement, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make these provisions severable. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. This bill would make related findings and declarations.

Your view
Official source ↗

Current stage

Status unavailable

Introduced

Feb 13, 2026

Latest action

Sep 3, 2026

Recorded roll calls

8

Topics and classification

Civixly topics

EducationJustice & Public SafetyElections & GovernmentLabor & EmploymentFamily & Social Services

Source subjects

Lawenforcement

Document type

Bill

Sponsors

Primary sponsors are listed before cosponsors and other sponsoring entities.

Primary sponsorPérez
coauthor

Connolly

coauthor

Elhawary

coauthor

Fong

coauthor

Gipson

coauthor

Gonzalez

coauthor

Haney

coauthor

Lee

coauthor

Mark González

coauthorMcNerney
coauthor

Ortega

coauthor

Ward

coauthorWiener

Action timeline

Newest action first. Action language is supplied by the state source.

The detailed timeline has not been imported yet.

Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

Roll-call votes

The newest recorded chamber votes appear first. Your own representatives are highlighted when available.

passAug 27, 2026Senate

Unfinished Business SB1105 Pérez et al. Concurrence

Vote source ↗
27 yes11 no2 other
View 40 recorded positions
Allenyes
Alvarado-Gilno
Archuletayes
Arreguínyes
Ashbyyes
Beckeryes
Blakespearyes
Cabaldonyes
Caballeroyes
Cervantesyes
Choino
Corteseyes
Dahleno
Durazoyes
Gonzalezyes
Graysonyes
Groveno
Hurtadoother
Jonesno
Lairdyes
Limónyes
McGuireyes
McNerneyyes
Menjivaryes
Niellono
Ochoa Boghno
Padillayes
Pérezyes
Reyesyes
Richardsonyes
Rubioyes
Seyartono
Smallwood-Cuevasyes
Sternno
Stricklandno
Umbergyes
Valladaresno
Wahabyes
Weber Piersonother
Wieneryes
passAug 25, 2026Assembly

SB 1105 Pérez Senate Third Reading By Schultz

Vote source ↗
58 yes19 no2 other
View 79 recorded positions
Addisyes
Aguiar-Curryyes
Ahrensyes
Alanisno
Alvarezyes
Arambulayes
Ávila Faríasyes
Bainsyes
Bauer-Kahanyes
Bennettyes
Bermanyes
Blanca Rubioyes
Boerneryes
Bontayes
Bryanyes
Calderonyes
Calozayes
Carrilloyes
Castillono
Celeste Rodriguezyes
Chenno
Connollyyes
Daviesno
DeMaiono
Dixonno
Elhawaryyes
Ellisno
Florano
Fongyes
Gabrielyes
Garciayes
Gipsonyes
Hadwickno
Haneyyes
Harabedianyes
Hartyes
Hooverno
Irwinyes
Jacksonyes
Jeff Gonzalezno
Johnsonno
Kalrayes
Krellyes
Lackeyno
Leeyes
Lowenthalyes
Macedono
Mark Gonzálezyes
McKinnorother
Michelle Rodriguezyes
Muratsuchiyes
Nguyenyes
Ortegayes
Pachecoyes
Papanyes
Patelyes
Pattersonno
Pellerinyes
Petrie-Norrisyes
Quirk-Silvayes
Ramosyes
Ransomyes
Rivasyes
Rogersyes
Sanchezno
Schiavoyes
Schultzyes
Sharp-Collinsyes
Solacheyes
Soriayes
Stefaniyes
Tano
Tangipano
Valenciaother
Wallisno
Wardyes
Wicksyes
Wilsonyes
Zburyes
passAug 13, 2026Assembly

Do pass as amended.

Vote source ↗
11 yes4 no0 other
View 15 recorded positions
Arambulayes
Calderonyes
Calozayes
Dixonno
Fongyes
Hooverno
Krellyes
Mark Gonzálezyes
Pachecoyes
Pellerinyes
Sharp-Collinsyes
Solacheyes
Tano
Tangipano
Wicksyes
passJun 30, 2026Assembly

Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

Vote source ↗
6 yes1 no2 other
View 9 recorded positions
Alanisother
Haneyyes
Harabedianyes
Lackeyno
Mark Gonzálezyes
Nguyenother
Ramosyes
Schultzyes
Sharp-Collinsyes
passMay 27, 2026Senate

3rd Reading SB1105 Pérez et al.

Vote source ↗
21 yes13 no6 other
View 40 recorded positions
Allenyes
Alvarado-Gilno
Archuletaother
Arreguínyes
Ashbyyes
Beckeryes
Blakespearno
Cabaldonno
Caballerono
Cervantesother
Choino
Corteseyes
Dahleother
Durazoyes
Gonzalezyes
Graysonyes
Groveno
Hurtadoother
Jonesno
Lairdyes
Limónyes
McGuireyes
McNerneyyes
Menjivaryes
Niellono
Ochoa Boghno
Padillayes
Pérezyes
Reyesyes
Richardsonyes
Rubioyes
Seyartono
Smallwood-Cuevasyes
Sternother
Stricklandno
Umbergno
Valladaresno
Wahabyes
Weber Piersonother
Wieneryes
passMay 14, 2026Senate

Do pass

Vote source ↗
5 yes2 no0 other
View 7 recorded positions
Cabaldonyes
Cervantesyes
Dahleno
Graysonyes
Richardsonyes
Seyartono
Wahabyes
passApr 20, 2026Senate

Placed on suspense file

Vote source ↗
7 yes0 no0 other
View 7 recorded positions
Cabaldonyes
Cervantesyes
Dahleyes
Graysonyes
Richardsonyes
Seyartoyes
Wahabyes
passApr 7, 2026Senate

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

Vote source ↗
5 yes1 no0 other
View 6 recorded positions
Arreguínyes
Caballeroyes
Corteseyes
Pérezyes
Seyartono
Wieneryes

SB 1105 discussion

0 comments

Sign in to join the discussion.Comments are publicly visible.

Loading comments...

State legislative data provided by Open States and available official sources.

Source data last updated Sep 4, 2026.